News - Delhi High Court pulls up Central Board of Secondary Education - for not informing about re-evaluation order
The Delhi High Court has pulled up the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE)
for causing hardship to students by not informing on its site that re-evaluation was permissible in all subjects of class 12.
The court's remarks came after it was told that the Board was reluctant to accept applications for re-evaluation after the high court on July 6
had directed Central Board of Secondary Education
to re-evaluate the answer sheets of all the subjects of all students who wrote the class 12 examination this year and were seeking re-evaluation.
CBSE on re-evaluation :
The Board defended its decision by claiming that the deadline for accepting applications was July 7, as per an earlier order of the high court. It also added that re-evaluation cannot be an open-ended exercise.
Here's what Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar Said:
A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar, however, did not accept the CBSE's argument and said, "Why did you not post our order online on your website? You gave the students only one-day's time (on July 7) to apply for re-evaluation without even informing them about our decision (of July 6)."
The court also said that once it passed the July 6 order, the deadline no longer applied.
In its July 6 order the high court had said that "the relief (of re-evaluation) is not confined only to the petitioners before it and shall be admissible to all the similarly situated students who seek re-evaluation of their answer sheets."
Disparity in marks:
During the proceedings, the court told the lawyers, appearing for some students whose answer sheets were not re- evaluated by the Board, to file an application and said it would pass appropriate orders thereafter. The observations came during hearing of a plea filed by 4 students against the CBSE's June 28
notice imposing certain conditions with regard to re-evaluation of answer sheets.
The marks of all 4 petitioner students saw substantial increase, their lawyers told the bench which said to CBSE, "Have you looked at the disparity? 64 marks have become 93 (in one case). That is too much."
When the Board said that in most cases the increase was of only one of two marks, the court remarked that "even one mark makes a lot of difference".
The next hearing would take place on August 29.