The Delhi High Court has signaled its unwillingness to direct the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) to reopen the revaluation portal, noting that any further extension could delay revised results and disrupt admission procedures for a large number of students.

The remarks were made while hearing a petition filed by the National Students' Union of India (NSUI). The court emphasized that the revaluation process is already underway and expressed concern that judicial intervention at this stage could affect the timely completion of the exercise.

Government Opposes Additional Revaluation Window

Appearing on behalf of the Centre, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta argued that the petition relied on broad concerns rather than specific grievances. He maintained that reopening the portal would not serve the interests of students whose applications are already being processed.

The government informed the court that CBSE had provided two opportunities for students to apply for revaluation—between May 19 and May 25, followed by another window from June 2 to June 7.

According to the submissions, nearly 1.67 lakh students have already requested revaluation, covering around 3.8 lakh answer scripts. Authorities warned that introducing another application period could postpone the release of revised results and affect counselling schedules, university admissions, and applications involving international institutions.

NSUI Seeks Four-Day Extension

Counsel representing NSUI requested a further four-day extension, arguing that some students were still awaiting an opportunity to submit revaluation requests.

The petition highlighted that even a small increase in marks following reassessment can significantly influence admission prospects, scholarship eligibility, and access to higher education opportunities. It was also argued that many affected students may be hesitant to pursue individual legal action.

Court Leaves Option for Individual Petitions

The High Court declined to issue directions for reopening the portal. Instead, it observed that students or parents who believe they have been adversely affected may seek relief by filing separate petitions before the court.

After the Centre clarified that no fresh applications would be accepted beyond those already submitted, the matter was adjourned and may be considered further by the appropriate bench in accordance with court procedures.